The Nativity - Lost in Translation


One of the most prominent examples of how our 21st Century Western outlook on the Bible can distort the gospels is that of the nativity.
We have a
very ‘school play’ vision of this. Joseph and Mary treacherously trekking
through the desert, only to arrive at Bethlehem with no hospitality extended
and no warm welcome into any room. We imagine that no-one really cares for
Mary and Joseph; that Bethlehem has no desire to aid a woman with child and is
willing to dishonour her husband by refusing him provision for his wife. All in
all, we consider the Nativity story to witness to a grievous lack of hospitality.
Know the facts
But
as Kenneth E. Bailey shows us in his book Jesus Through Middle Eastern Eyes (Bailey, Intervarsity Press, 2008) an acquaintance with the Middle Eastern culture sheds a very different light on
this classic tale.
Bailey
grew up in the Middle-East and lived there for sixty years (1935-1995). He
points out that a knowledge of Middle Eastern cultural customs, traditions,
language and way of life is essential for examining the depth of the Christian
Scriptures, particularly the gospels. Otherwise we can drastically misinterpret
the narrative.
Very different
Jesus
and his followers lived some two thousand years ago in the 1st Century. They would have spoken Aramaic, but most of the New Testament was written
in Greek. It's almost inevitable that things have become lost in translation,
and through a misunderstanding of a life so very different from our 21st Century British experience.
Blood lines
The fact is that Joseph was returning to the
village of his origin. And, in Middle Eastern culture family blood lines are
recorded and well known by members of a community. Joseph being a Bethlehemite
would have been known by many of his extended family within Bethlehem itself.
The notion of Joseph and Mary hopelessly knocking on door after door searching
for just ‘someone’ who would let he and his wife take shelter is therefore far from the
truth. There would have been many in this town who would have been able to
accommodate the needs of Joseph and Mary.
Royal blood
In addition, we are told that Joseph was of royal blood (Luke 2:4). He was of the family of King David. Because this family was so famous in Bethlehem, local folk had coined the phrase that Bethlehem was the ‘City of David’, even though the Hebrew Scriptures refer to that as being Jerusalem. With this heritage to his advantage, Joseph would have been accepted almost anywhere.
In the second part of this article we will explore what the phrase 'no room at the inn' really means.
Related Content
Hope Not Disgrace
Charlie Thomson Sermons